Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SUN ACCIDENT CO. et al. v. BUNN

APPEAL AND ERROR — Verdict — Evidence. Where there is evidence tending to support the verdict in an action at law, this court will not weigh the evidence, but, if it reasonably tends to support the verdict and judgment, they will not be disturbed.

(Syllabus by Devereux, C.)

Opinion by DEVEREUX, C. (after stating the facts as above).

The only assignment of error argued in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence. One of the doctors, who attended the assured, testified that she died of inflammation of the stomach and bowels, while another testified that she died of tuberculosis. In this conflict the jury was the proper tribunal to say what was the cause of her death, and as they have found for the plaintiff we will not disturb the verdict. Avants v. Bruner, 39 Okla. 730, 136 P. 593; Peters v. Holder, 40 Okla. 93, 136 P. 400.

We therefore recommend that the judugment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUN ACCIDENT CO. ET AL. v. BUNN
(Oct 12, 1915)