Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KING v. POOL

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Case-Made. Where plaintiff in error fails to make and serve his case-made within the time allowed by statute, or within the time as extended by the court before the expiration of the statutory period, the same is a nullity, and, on motion, the appeal will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

PER CURIAM.

The order overruling the motion for a new trial in this cause was made and entered on March 29, 1915. The record before us fails to disclose that an extension of the time for serving case-made was made by the trial court until May 26, 1915. As the case-made was not served within the time allowed by statute (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5242), nor did the trial court attempt to extend the time for such service before the expiration of the statutory period, nor is the record certified as a transcript, it follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KING v. POOL
(Dec 21, 1915)