Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSEPH J. BULLOCK, Respondent, v. MAY E. BULLOCK, Appellant.

BURNETT, J. —

Appellant filed her brief in the supreme court on the thirty-first day of August, 1914. The cause was thereafter transferred to this court and came on regularly for hearing on the nineteenth day of this month. Respondent has never filed any brief, either in the supreme or this court nor did he appear at the oral argument. He was regularly served with notice that on said nineteenth day of January, 1916, appellant would move this court "for an order reversing the order appealed from without consideration of the cause upon its merits . . . upon the ground that respondent has not filed his points and authorities herein." As stated, there was no appearance by respondent.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal Irr. Co., 101 Cal. 582, [36 P. 96]; Davis v. Hart, 103 Cal. 530, [37 P. 486]; Kelly v. Bradbury, 104 Cal. 237, [37 P. 872].

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BULLOCK v. BULLOCK
(Jan 24, 1916)