Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BENNETT et al. v. ABBOTT

APPEAL AND ERROR — Death of Party — Dismissal. One of the plaintiffs in error died pending proceedings in error and before submission in this court. Nothing was done to revive the action, and the year (sec. 5294, Rev. Laws 1910) expired. The defendant in error, without consenting to a revivor, moved to dismiss. Held that the action is barred by the statute, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

(Syllabus by Mathews, C.)

Opinion by MATHEWS, C.

On January 5, 1916, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, alleging therein that W.D. Coleman, one of the plaintiffs in error, died on December 14, 1914, that a joint judgment was rendered in the trial court against both of the plaintiffs in error, and that this action has not been revived in the name of the administrator of the estate of the said W.D. Coleman.

This appeal was perfected on March 12, 1914, and submitted December 13, 1915. There has been no effort made to revive the same. Following the rule laid down in McKay v. Watson et al., 40 Okla. 353, 137 P. 1177, we recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BENNETT ET AL. v. ABBOTT
(Feb 1, 1916)