Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

McKONE et al. v. HOGAN

APPEAL AND ERROR — Record — Questions Presented for Review — Evidence. Where it is necessary to examine the evidence to determine the issues raised on appeal, and it appears upon the face of the record that all the evidence offered and introduced at the trial of the cause has not been brought to this court by the case-made, the appeal may be dismissed or the judgment affirmed.

(Syllabus by Brett, C.)

Opinion by BRETT, C.

This action was commenced by S.W. Hogan, the defendant in error, against Isabella A. McKone and Roger McKone, the plaintiffs in error, to recover upon a note and foreclose a mortgage given on real estate to secure the payment of this note. A trial was had to the court without a jury, which resulted in a judgment for the amount prayed for and a decree of foreclosure.

The plaintiffs in error attempted to appeal from this judgment and decree; but the record shows upon its face that there were three exhibits introduced and admitted in evidence, over the objection of the plaintiffs in error, and they are not in the record filed in this case. These exhibits are material evidence, and, to review the questions attempted to be raised by this appeal, it is essential that this court examine this evidence. But, since it is not here, we cannot do this; and, the presumption being in favor of the correctness of the judgment, we recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McKONE ET AL. v. HOGAN
(Feb 15, 1916)