Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

STARR et al. v. HAYGOOD

APPEAL AND ERROR — Appeal Bond — Entry of Judgment. Where supersedeas bond is filed, and on appeal to this court the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, on motion of defendant in error judgment will be entered in this court against the sureties on the appeal bond.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

HARDY, J.

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the county court of Muskogee county supersedeas bond was filed, executed by plaintiffs in error, Burrell Starr and Mun Brown, as principals, and J.M. McLemore, as surety, to stay execution of said judgment. On September 14, 1915, the judgment of the lower court was affirmed in an opinion by Brewer, C. (54 Okla. ___,

153 P. 1157), and defendant in error files motion for judgment against the surety on the supersedeas bond. The motion must be sustained. Long v. Lang Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 P. 1078, and cases there cited.

Judgment was rendered in the trial court on June 3, 1912, in the sum of $75, and costs; and it is provided by section 1008, Rev. Laws 1910, that judgments shall bear interest at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum, except when otherwise specified.

Judgment will therefore be entered in this court against the surety on the appeal bond in the sum of $75, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum from June 3, 1912, and for costs, for which execution may issue.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STARR ET AL. v. HAYGOOD
(Apr 11, 1916)