HARRISON v. CROSBY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

9379

Attorney(S)

Mr. B.B. Clarke, for appellant, cites: As to presumption in favor of holder as indorsee for value,
: 87 S.C. 78
28 S.C. 143
32 S.C. 538. Charge: 64 S.C. 509
77 S.C. 39. Mr. W.B. de Loach, for respondent, cites: As to circumstantial evidence of holder's bad faith: 91 S.C. 461.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

9379

Attorney(S)

Mr. B.B. Clarke, for appellant, cites: As to presumption in favor of holder as indorsee for value,
: 87 S.C. 78
28 S.C. 143
32 S.C. 538. Charge: 64 S.C. 509
77 S.C. 39. Mr. W.B. de Loach, for respondent, cites: As to circumstantial evidence of holder's bad faith: 91 S.C. 461.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

HARRISON v. CROSBY.

April 13, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE HYDRICK.

This case is controlled by the decision in Bank v. Stackhouse, 91 S.C. 455, 74 S.E. 977, 40 L.R.A. (N.S.) 454, which has been reaffirmed in numerous cases, some of which are cited in Givens v. Bank, 103 S.C. 174, 86 S.E. 24. See, also, Cannon v. Clarendon Hardware Co., 103 S.C. 538, 88 S.E. 284. The verdict should have been directed for plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and GAGE concur in the opinion announced.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MR. JUSTICE FRASER did not sit in this case, and did not participate in the decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.