Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

E.C. LUNDSCHIEN v. THE STATE.

Malicious Mischief — Statement of Facts.

Where the statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed within the time allowed by law, they must be stricken from the record and the judgment affirmed. Following Durham v. State, 69 Tex.Crim. Rep., and other cases.

HARPER, JUDGE.

Appellant was prosecuted for wilfully and maliciously killing a mule, the property of W.F. Lundschien, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200.

Appellant was tried the 8th day of last October, and that term of court adjourned on October 23, 1915. The Assistant Attorney General has moved to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception, because not filed within the time allowed by law. The motion is sustained, and the judgment is affirmed. De Friend v. State, 69 Tex.Crim. Rep., 153 S.W. Rep., 881; Durham v. State, 69 Tex.Crim. Rep., 155 S.W. Rep., 222.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LUNDSCHIEN v. THE STATE
(Apr 5, 1916)