Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

FRANCESCO DI TOMMASO, Respondent, v. SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified answered in the negative; remaining questions not answered; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DI TOMMASO v. SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
(May 2, 1916)