Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BEACHAM v. CITY OF GREENVILLE.

June 30, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.

This is an action for injunction to restrain the city of Greenville from issuing bonds, to the amount of $40,000, for the city hospital, which were voted at an election ordered for the purpose of deciding that question.

The appellant's attorneys in their argument state that it is impossible for them to differentiate this case from that of Seegers v. Gibbes, 72 S.C. 532, 52 S.E. 586, and they freely admit that if the Court adheres to the ruling therein announced, the city has the right to exclude from the calculations the two disputed items. This Court does adhere to its ruling in that case, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated by his Honor, the presiding Judge.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEACHAM v. CITY OF GREENVILLE
(Jun 30, 1916)