AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent and Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant and Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK
(Jul 11, 1916)