Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHICAGO, R.I. P. RY. CO. v. RICH

Justices of the Peace — Review of Decisions — Security — Deposit.

The procedure for taking appeals from the justice to the county or district court is provided in the statutes, and the only provisions therein for securing the costs is by giving an appeal bond, and the appellate judge has no right or authority to require the appellant to make a cash deposit to cover the costs in the appellate court.

(syllabus by Mathews, C.)

Opinion by MATHEWS, C.

The question raised by this appeal involves the right of the county or district judge to require the appellant on appeal from the justice of the peace court to make a cash deposit to cover the costs in the appellate court and to dismiss the appeal upon the failure to comply with such a requirement.

This exact question was passed upon by this court in the case of St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. McAllister, 56 Okla. 244, 155 P. 1123, and was there answered in the negative. Following that case we recommend that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions that the dismissal be set aside and same reinstated.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHICAGO, R.I. P. RY. CO. v. RICH
(Jun 20, 1916)