Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. N.J. Frederick, for appellant, cites: Const., art. X, sec. 4; Civil Code, sec. 294, subd. 2; 63 S.C. 7; Const., art. X, sec. 3, art I, sec. 17; 34 Ill. 203 and 276; 4 Conn. 419; 53 Wis. 183; 29 Wis. 400; 45 Ala. 310; 93 Pa. 129; 2 Cooley Taxation (3d ed.) 1153. Street assessment a tax: 42 S.C. 293; 7 Md. 535; 9 Kan. App. 251; 104 Mass. 470; 117 Ill. 11. Municipality cannot tax church property: Civil Code, sec. 3011; which is exempt: Const., art. X, sec. 13; 1 Cooley Taxation (3d ed.) 355 and 502. Repeals by implication not favored: 39 S.C. 5; 74 Miss. 821. Mr. C.S. Monteith, for respondent, cites: As to power of city to levy assessment: Const., art. X, sec. 14; 27 Stats. 23 and 225. As to exemption: Const., art. X, sec. 4; 5 McQuillan Munc. Corp., sec. 2064; Cooley Const. Lim. (7th ed.) 740; 76 Ga. 181; 4 Dillon Munc. Corp., secs. 1431, 1444 and 1445; 42 S.C. 293; 131 Pa. St. 109; 143 Pa. St. 367; Page Jones, Taxation by Assessment, sec. 588; 12 L.R.A. 852; 41 Neb. 358; 103 S.C. 184.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. N.J. Frederick, for appellant, cites: Const., art. X, sec. 4; Civil Code, sec. 294, subd. 2; 63 S.C. 7; Const., art. X, sec. 3, art I, sec. 17; 34 Ill. 203 and 276; 4 Conn. 419; 53 Wis. 183; 29 Wis. 400; 45 Ala. 310; 93 Pa. 129; 2 Cooley Taxation (3d ed.) 1153. Street assessment a tax: 42 S.C. 293; 7 Md. 535; 9 Kan. App. 251; 104 Mass. 470; 117 Ill. 11. Municipality cannot tax church property: Civil Code, sec. 3011; which is exempt: Const., art. X, sec. 13; 1 Cooley Taxation (3d ed.) 355 and 502. Repeals by implication not favored: 39 S.C. 5; 74 Miss. 821. Mr. C.S. Monteith, for respondent, cites: As to power of city to levy assessment: Const., art. X, sec. 14; 27 Stats. 23 and 225. As to exemption: Const., art. X, sec. 4; 5 McQuillan Munc. Corp., sec. 2064; Cooley Const. Lim. (7th ed.) 740; 76 Ga. 181; 4 Dillon Munc. Corp., secs. 1431, 1444 and 1445; 42 S.C. 293; 131 Pa. St. 109; 143 Pa. St. 367; Page Jones, Taxation by Assessment, sec. 588; 12 L.R.A. 852; 41 Neb. 358; 103 S.C. 184.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

WESLEY M.E. CHURCH v. CITY OF COLUMBIA.

August 10, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE GAGE.

The appeal presents a single issue of law. It is not denied that if the pavement in issue had been put down before the lot of a citizen, that the citizen would be bound to pay for it. It is only denied that a like obligation rests on the plaintiff here, because the plaintiff is a church, and its property is by the fundamental law exempt from "taxation."

The charge in the instant case was not a tax within the meaning of the Constitution of 1895. That issue is thoroughly discussed, and decided adverse to the appellant, in Railroad v. Decatur, 147 U.S. 190, 13 Sup. Ct. 293, 37 L.Ed. 132.

The judgment below is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WESLEY M.E. CHURCH v. CITY OF COLUMBIA
(Aug 10, 1916)