AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FRUIT LAND COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. E. F. MAY, Appellant.

PLUMMER, J., pro tem. —

This action, No. 1578, is a companion cause of action to No. 1577, Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357, this day decided, and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this action is hereby affirmed.

Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 12, 1917.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FRUIT LAND COMPANY v. MAY
(Dec 15, 1916)