Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FIRST STATE BANK OF WARNER v. PORTER

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal and Error — Time for Appeal — Dismissal.

Proceeding in error dismissed for the reason that same was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1910-11.

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground, among others, that the same was not commenced within the time provided by law. The record shows that the appeal was taken from a judgment rendered on the 12th day of February, 1916, and an order overruling the motion for new trial therein, which was entered on the first day of April, 1916. No summons in error has been issued or served up to this time. It, therefore, appears that the proceeding in error was not commenced within the time required by chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1910-11, which provides:

"All proceedings for reversing, vacating and modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of."

The proceeding in error, therefore, must be dismissed upon the authority of Shelton v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 79, 162 P. 1092.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FIRST STATE BANK OF WARNER v. PORTER
(Jan 30, 1917)