Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

PICKERELL CRAIG COMPANY v. WHOLESALE COMPANY.

Defendant appealed.

PER CURIAM.

This case was before us at a former term, 169 N.C. 381. At the last trial, when the judgment from which this appeal is taken was rendered, the court seems to have followed the principles stated in the first appeal, and we see no substantial error in the case. The exceptions are taken mostly to questions of evidence, but neither party appears to have been really prejudiced by that which was admitted, or by any of the rulings. Young v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 272. A fair opportunity was given to present the case on both sides, and we must decline to disturb the judgment.

No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PICKERELL v. WHOLESALE CO
(Feb 1, 1917)