Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. SOCKUM.

CONRAD, J.

George U. Sockum was indicted for unlawfully carrying concealed a deadly weapon, etc. Not guilty.

Argued before CONRAD, J.

David J. Reinhardt, Atty. Gen., and Daniel J. Layton, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State. John M. Richardson and Frank M. Jones, both of Georgetown, for the accused.

George U. Sockum was indicted for unlawfully carrying "concealed a deadly weapon upon or about his person other than an ordinary pocket knife, namely, a certain firearm, commonly called a revolver, he * * * then and there, not being a policeman or other peace officer," etc. The state proved that at the time and place laid in the indictment, the accused, after having a wordy altercation with the prosecuting witness, went to his overcoat lying on a timber wagon, and took therefrom a revolver and placed it in his hip pocket, placing his hand over it. That he thereupon "dared any one of the three of us to do anything to him."

When the state rested, counsel for accused moved that the court instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty because it had neither been alleged nor proved that the accused had no license to carry concealed a deadly weapon. Rev. Code 1915, § 262.

The state contended that if accused had a license, it was peculiarly within his knowledge, and was a matter of defense.

CONRAD, J. The court does not agree with the contention made by counsel for the accused, and declines to give binding instructions.

After the usual charge in such cases,

Verdict, not guilty.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Sockum
(Feb 7, 1917)