Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Judges Nancy E. Smith See more information ... Smart Summary Factual and Procedural Background The case captioned THOMAS PARKER COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and Others, Defendants, impleaded with FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Respondent, was before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department, in May 1917. The panel consisted of Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. The opinion is a short appellate disposition: the Appellate Division affirmed the judgment, with costs, citing authority in a prior case. Legal Issues Presented The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues. Arguments of the Parties The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments. Table of Precedents Cited Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court Bradley Son v. Huber Co. (146 App. Div. 630; affd., 210 N.Y. 627) Not specified in the provided opinion; cited as controlling authority. The court affirmed the judgment, with costs, on the authority of this case. Court's Reasoning and Analysis The opinion provides minimal reasoning. The court's dispositive statement is that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Bradley Son v. Huber Co. No further explanation, factual analysis, or legal elaboration is contained in the provided text. Holding and Implications Judgment affirmed, with costs. Direct effect: The appellate court affirmed the judgment below and awarded costs. The opinion does not discuss broader implications or articulate a new rule of law beyond applying the cited authority. Show full summary ... THOMAS PARKER COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Bradley Son v. Huber Co. ( 146 App. Div. 630; affd., 210 N.Y. 627).