AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. WILLIAM B. SHARP et al., Respondents.

KERRIGAN, J. —

As in the case of the same plaintiff against Ellen Dore et al., No. 2068 ( ante, p. 521, [ 168 P. 147]), this day decided, the appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants after demurrer sustained to the complaint. It presents the same point as did that case, and the question was submitted and argued on the same briefs. The conclusion arrived at there is controlling here, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Richards, J., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 3, 1917.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. SHARP
(Sep 4, 1917)