SCHMIDT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, N.Y. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

John F. O'Brien, for the appellant The City of New
Frederick L.C. Keating, for the appellant Bradley Contracting
Peter Klein, for the

Judges

PER CURIAM:

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

John F. O'Brien, for the appellant The City of New
Frederick L.C. Keating, for the appellant Bradley Contracting
Peter Klein, for the

Judges

PER CURIAM:

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LEONARD SCHMIDT, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and BRADLEY CONTRACTING COMPANY, Appellants, Impleaded with NEW YORK RAILWAYS COMPANY, Defendant.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in Schmidt v. City of New York ( 179 App. Div. 667), decided herewith, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellants in this court and the court below.

PER CURIAM:

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

SCHMIDT v. CITY OF NEW YORK

LEONARD SCHMIDT, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and BRADLEY CONTRACTING COMPANY, Appellants, Impleaded with NEW YORK RAILWAYS COMPANY, Defendant.

Comments