AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, SECOND DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. MOUNT VERNON TAXICAB COMPANY, Defendant.

TOMPKINS, J.

Counsel for the defendant urged me to read their brief through, and to do it carefully. That I have done, and have given much thought to the case and to every phase of it, and have reached the conclusion that the operation of the defendant's bus service between Mount Vernon and Rye Beach is in competition with another common carrier, and therefore without the consent of the local authorities of the cities of Mount Vernon and New Rochelle and a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the public service commission is unlawful.

The operation of the busses carrying about twenty people each on a regular line or route is altogether different than an ordinary taxicab service where vehicles are operated upon no regular route but take patrons anywhere they choose to go. I think the defendant's bus line from New Rochelle and then on to Rye Beach is such a line as the statute contemplates can only do business with the consent of the local authorities and the public service commission.

The petitioner's application will, therefore, be granted, but without costs save taxable disbursements.

Application granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PUB. SERV. COMM. v. MOUNT VERNON TAXICAB CO
(Nov 1, 1917)