Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNDERWOOD v. UNDERWOOD et al.

SOMERVILLE, J.

In this case the chancellor has filed his opinion, in which he very fully and clearly reviews the evidence and applies the settled principles of law to the conclusions he has reached upon the issues of fact presented. We have likewise carefully reviewed the evidence in the light of the elaborate arguments presented by counsel, and we think the findings and decree of the chancellor should be affirmed.

The evidence is very voluminous, and sharply conflicting in some of its most material aspects. Much may be and has been plausibly said in impeachment of the chancellor's findings. For the satisfaction of counsel we would like to analyze and discuss the evidence in detail, but, in accordance with our present policy in deciding questions of fact (see Acts 1915, pp. 594, 595, § 3), we must simply announce our conclusion.

Let the decree of the chancery court be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNDERWOOD v. UNDERWOOD
(Dec 24, 1917)