AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. ROSENBERG SONS CO., Respondent.

KERRIGAN, J. —

The questions involved in this appeal are in all respects similar to those presented in Armour Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co. (No. 2104), ante, p. 773, [ 173 P. 404], and upon the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.

Zook, J., pro tem., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 13, 1918, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 10, 1918.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CUDAHY PACKING CO. v. R. ROSENBERG SONS CO
(Apr 13, 1918)