Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BANK OF HENRY v. NORTON.

MAYFIELD, J.

This was an action of trover for the conversion of three hogs. The trial, which was by the court without a jury, resulted in a judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff relied upon a mortgage title acquired from one George Carter, and defendant relied upon a sale by one Emily Carter, the wife of George Carter. There was abundant evidence, if true, to support the title of either. There being no jury, the court, of course, had to hear all that was offered as evidence, before he could pass upon its relevancy or competency.

We find no prejudicial error in the rulings on the evidence, and are not prepared to say that the trial court erred in its findings or in the judgment rendered. There are involved no questions of law which merit discussion.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK OF HENRY v. NORTON
(Apr 18, 1918)