Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DIDIO RAMOS v. THE STATE.

Local Option — Sufficiency of the Evidence.

Where, upon appeal from a conviction of a violation of the local option law, the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, there was no reversible error.

DAVIDSON, PRESIDING JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $62.50 and twenty days imprisonment in the county jail.

There are no legal questions presented for revision. It is contended, however, that the evidence is not sufficient. The State's testimony shows a sale by the defendant to the alleged purchaser, Collins. Collins testified that he bought a quart and a half, or a quart and a pint of whisky from appellant and paid him $2.75 for it. Appellant denies the transaction. This formed an issue of fact for solution by the jury. Under this condition of the record we would not feel justified in reversing the case. The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAMOS v. THE STATE
(May 29, 1918)