Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OLIPHANT et al. v. CRANE et al.

Pleading — Judgment on Pleading — Effect — Admissions.

The syllabus in No. 8571, John A. Oliphant et al. v. J.E. Crane, Administrator, ante, p. 38, 172 P. 1073, is adopted herein.

(Syllabus by Galbraith, C.)

Opinion by GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action against the sureties on a supersedeas bond given to stay execution pending appeal from the judgment of the trial court to the Supreme Court of the state. It differs only from case No. 8571, ante, p. 38, 172 P. 1073, just handed down, in that the judgment recovered against the Merchants' Planters' Insurance Company was recovered by Laura Crane and J.H. Harrison. The judgment was for the same amount and rendered in the same court and on the same day as in case No. 8571, and the supersedeas bond was in the same amount, and was executed by the same principal and sureties. The judgment on appeal was affirmed on the second day of April, 1912. Both the parties plaintiff in the trial court, Laura Crane and J.H. Harrison, having died, this action was prosecuted by their respective administrators.

The petition in this action alleged the same facts as ground for recovery and the answer sets up the same ground for defense as in case No. 8571. Upon authority of that case the judgment appealed from in this case should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLIPHANT v. CRANE
(May 14, 1918)