Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CALIFORNIA MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent, v. CHESTER A. SMITH,Marshal and Ex-officio Tax Collector, etc., et al., Defendants; WALDO S.JOHNSON, Appellant.JOHN MARTIN, Respondent,

THE COURT.

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [ 175 P. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CALIFORNIA MIDLAND RAILWAY CO. v. SMITH
(Sep 5, 1918)