Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES F. YATES ET AL. v. DIXIE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Appeal and Error — Fragmentary Appeals.

The Court suggests that fragmentary appeals be not permitted.

BROWN, J.

This case was before us last term and is reported 173 N.C. 473. The appeal was dismissed because premature, but an opinion was rendered, as is sometimes done, to facilitate a disposition of a case.

That opinion is authoritative and disposes of this case, and holds that plaintiffs cannot recover.

We suggest to the judges of the Superior Court that fragmentary and premature appeals be not permitted. It is best that all the issues be determined and a final judgment rendered before a case is brought to this Court.

Action dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YATES v. INSURANCE CO
(Nov 1, 1918)