AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, Respondent, v. NEW ROCHELLE COAL AND LUMBER COMPANY, Appellant.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the locus in quo was an existing highway. The evidence conclusively establishes that for more than six years prior to the commencement of the action the strip of land in suit had been closed to travel for its entire width. The obstructed section had, therefore, ceased to be a highway. (Highway Law, § 234; Barnes v. Midland R.R. Terminal Co., 218 N.Y. 91, 98.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE v. NEW ROCHELLE COAL LUMBER
(Nov 26, 1918)