FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BRIDGEPORT v. AKIN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 3076.

Attorney(S)

McMurray Gettys and H.F. Lobdell, for plaintiff in error, cited: Acts of 1913, chap. 32; Speer's Marital Rights in Texas, secs. 148, 152; Spence v. Fenchler, 107 Tex. 443; Chase v. Swayne, 88 Tex. 218; Missouri, K. T. Ry. Co. v. Mahaffey, 105 Tex. 394. Bumpass Crumbaugh, for defendant in error, cited: Lynch v. Elkes, 21 Tex. 229; Trimble v. Miller, 24 Tex. 215 [ 24 Tex. 215]; Farr v. Wright Hart, 27 Tex. 96 [ 27 Tex. 96]; Covington v. Burleson, 28 Tex. 368 [ 28 Tex. 368]; Menard v. Sydnor, 29 Tex. 257; Harris v. Williams, 44 Tex. 124; Howell v. McMurray Lumber Co., 132 S.W. 848; Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, 192 S.W. 1088; Akin v. Thompson, 196 S.W. 625.

Judges

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the court.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 3076.

Attorney(S)

McMurray Gettys and H.F. Lobdell, for plaintiff in error, cited: Acts of 1913, chap. 32; Speer's Marital Rights in Texas, secs. 148, 152; Spence v. Fenchler, 107 Tex. 443; Chase v. Swayne, 88 Tex. 218; Missouri, K. T. Ry. Co. v. Mahaffey, 105 Tex. 394. Bumpass Crumbaugh, for defendant in error, cited: Lynch v. Elkes, 21 Tex. 229; Trimble v. Miller, 24 Tex. 215 [ 24 Tex. 215]; Farr v. Wright Hart, 27 Tex. 96 [ 27 Tex. 96]; Covington v. Burleson, 28 Tex. 368 [ 28 Tex. 368]; Menard v. Sydnor, 29 Tex. 257; Harris v. Williams, 44 Tex. 124; Howell v. McMurray Lumber Co., 132 S.W. 848; Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, 192 S.W. 1088; Akin v. Thompson, 196 S.W. 625.

Judges

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the court.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BRIDGEPORT v. W.J. AKIN ET AL.

Case Followed — Married Woman's Contract.

The rulings in Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, ante, p. 287, are followed and held to control the disposition of this case. The Married Woman's Act of 1913 does not confer on her power to contract as surety for her husband on a note not given for necessaries, and she is not bound thereby. (P. 298.)

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is ruled by the decision in Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, the question presented being the same.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BRIDGEPORT v. W.J. AKIN ET AL.

Comments