Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TOM BROWN v. STATE.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs — Rule of Court — Affirmance. When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and, if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the crime of rape, rendered against the defendant in the district court of Wagoner county, at the January, 1917, term. A petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on the 8th day of August, 1917, and the cause was finally submitted at the November, 1918, term.

No counsel for the defendant appeared, and no brief has been filed in his behalf. Rule 9 of this court is as follows:

"When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment."

Pursuant to said rule, the court has examined the pleadings, instructions, judgment, and sentence, and has carefully considered the same in connection with the grounds of alleged error set forth in the petition.

Failing to find any prejudicial error, the judgment is affirmed, under rule 9, supra.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROWN v. STATE
(Mar 1, 1919)