AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TILLY CHAMBELIS vs. THE CONNECTICUT COMPANY. FELIX ROMETSCH vs. THE CONNECTICUT COMPANY.

General Statutes, § 2242, provides that the prevailing party in a civil action shall receive $15 for the trial of an issue of law or fact, but if more than one issue of fact shall be tried at one time, only one trial fee shall be allowed. Held that where two distinct causes with different plaintiffs were by mutual agreement tried together to the same jury, with a separate verdict and judgment in each case, the prevailing party in each was entitled to recover a trial fee and also a jury fee.

PER CURIAM.

Each plaintiff was entitled to a jury fee and a trial fee. There were two jury trials, and the judgment in each case recites, accordingly, that it was committed to the jury. The agreement that the two cases should be tried together, related merely to the method of submitting the question of liability in each case to the jury. Otherwise the two litigations were independent, and on the issue of damages required separate trials.

The provision of § 2242 of the General Statutes which provides that "the prevailing party in any civil action . . . shall receive . . . for the trial of an issue of law or fact, fifteen dollars, but if more than one issue of fact shall be tried at one time, only one trial fee shall be allowed," does not apply. Here there are two prevailing parties having no privity of action.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHAMBELIS v. CONNECTICUT CO
(Jul 16, 1919)