Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ORR et al. v. STEWART.

SAMFORD, J.

Section 2846 of the Code of 1907, as amended by Acts 1915, p. 722, only authorizes an appeal from decisions on motions for new trials, where the motion shall be granted or refused. The statute presupposes a final determination of the matter. The order in this case does not grant the new trial, but in effect says it will be done unless the defendants do certain things. To be a judgment from which an appeal will lie, "It must be definite. It must purport to be the absolute sentence of the law, as distinguished from a direction to the effect that a judgment may be entered." Black on Judgments, vol. 1, § 3. The Supreme Court has expressed similar views in the following cases: Ex parte McLendon, 33 Ala. 276; Lide v. Park, 132 Ala. 222, 31 So. 360; Ex parte Bradshaw, 174 Ala. 245, 57 So. 16; Threadgill v. Dixie Industrial Co. (Sup.) 80 So. 391. As there is no judgment sufficient to give this court jurisdiction, it follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

202 Ala. 309.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ORR v. STEWART
(Dec 16, 1919)