Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

HENRY LOUISA STARKS v. JAMES W. LUSK, et al., Appellants.

The majority opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals, 187 S.W. 586, affirming the judgment in this case, is approved.

BOND, C.J.

This case is fully stated and elaborately discussed in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Springfield Court of Appeals (187 S.W. 586 et seq).

After a careful examination of the facts as shown in the record, we are satisfied that a correct conclusion was reached in the majority opinion. We therefore approve the majority opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals.

The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed. It is so ordered. All concur, except Goode and Graves, JJ., who dissent; Woodson, J., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STARKS v. LUSK
(Dec 22, 1919)