Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BAKER v. DEICHMAN et al.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal.

Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief as required by rule 7 of this court and given no excuse for not filing the same, it will be presumed he has abandoned his appeal, and when reached on submission, the appeal will be dismissed.

McNEILL, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the county court of Tulsa county. The petition in error was filed in this court on November 2, 1917. The case was assigned for submission at the December term, 1919. No briefs have been filed for the plaintiff in error. Rule 7 provides as follows:

"In each civil case filed in this court, counsel for plaintiff in error shall serve his brief on counsel for defendant in error at least 40 days before the case is set for submission."

Where the plaintiff in error has failed to comply with the rule of the court, he is deemed to have waived his right to have his appeal heard in this court, and it will be presumed that said appeal has been abandoned Davis v. Elliott, 25 Okla. 395, 106 P. 817.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

OWEN, C. J., and KANE, PITCHFORD JOHNSON, and HIGGINS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAKER v. DEICHMAN
(Feb 3, 1920)