Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OSBORNE v. YOUNGER.

HARPER, C.J.

Appellant filed this suit in trespass to try title against appellee September 25, 1902. The notations on the docket show that it was "passed" and "continued" from time to time to July 15, 1918, when plaintiff was required to file cost bond, and October 14, 1918, dismissed for failure to comply with the rule for costs as required by law. On May 23, 1919, at subsequent term, plaintiff filed motion to reinstate the cause. This appeal is from the order overruling the motion to reinstate, filed May 23, 1919.

The order contains the following recitals: The assignment is that the court erred in holding that it had "no jurisdiction or right to reinstate said cause." In this there was no error. It is well settled that after the adjournment of the term at which such judgment is entered it is no longer subject to the control of the trial court. Eddleman v. McGlathery, 74 Tex. 280, 11 S.W. 1100; Hester v. Baskin, 184 S.W. 726.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OSBORNE v. YOUNGER
(Mar 4, 1920)