Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROGERS et. al. v. BOMER et al.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal.

Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 (47 Okla. vi) of this court the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

RAINEY, J.

On January 13, 1920, an order was entered, giving plaintiff in error 30 days from that date in which to file brief, and the cause was thereafter submitted on February 10, 1920. No brief having been filed within the extension of time granted, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution. Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 P. 10; McGowen et al. v. Keller Ring, 77 Oklahoma.

OWEN, C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHN. SON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY. JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROGERS v. BOMER
(Mar 9, 1920)