Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BAHR v. CHICAGO, R.I. P. R. CO.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Case Followed.

Same as in cause No. 6343, D. W. Dotterer et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island Pacific R. Co. et al., ante, p. 67.

BAILEY, J.

The pleadings, evidence, and judgment in this case being identical with the record considered by this court in No. 6343, D. W. Dotterer et al. v. Chicago, R.I. P. R. Co. et al., ante, p. 67, and it having been agreed by counsel that this cause might be considered and consolidated with said cause No. 6343, for the reasons assigned in said cause, this case is reversed and remanded.

PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, and HIGGINS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAHR v. CHICAGO, R.I. P. R. CO
(Mar 30, 1920)