Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KING v. CENTRAL HARDWARE CO.

PER CURIAM.

This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 So. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 So. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KING v. CENTRAL HARDWARE CO
(Jun 3, 1920)