Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Ex parte LUNDY. LUNDY v. STATE.

McCLELLAN, J.

The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of Appeals. 85 So. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 So. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EX PARTE LUNDY
(Jun 30, 1920)