Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Frederick G. Bromberg, of Mobile, for
  • The fraud complained of was practiced in the very act of obtaining judgment against her
  • entitled her to
  • 189
  • 258, 65 So. 993
  • 170
  • 367, 54 So. 172. By permitting decree pro confesso,
  • failing to interpose demurrers, respondent waived the provisions of rule 14. 10
  • 305
  • 6
  • 299
  • 11
  • 668. No counsel marked for
Judges
  • THOMAS, J.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Frederick G. Bromberg, of Mobile, for
  • The fraud complained of was practiced in the very act of obtaining judgment against her
  • entitled her to
  • 189
  • 258, 65 So. 993
  • 170
  • 367, 54 So. 172. By permitting decree pro confesso,
  • failing to interpose demurrers, respondent waived the provisions of rule 14. 10
  • 305
  • 6
  • 299
  • 11
  • 668. No counsel marked for
Judges
  • THOMAS, J.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

BRUNNIER v. HILL et al.

THOMAS, J.

Bill in equity for relief against a judgment at law. The agreement of counsel set up was not in writing, and was within the influence of circuit court rule 14, Code 1907, p. 1520. Collier v. Falk, 66 Ala. 223; Norman v. Burns, 67 Ala. 248; Hendley v. Chabert, 189 Ala. 258, 267, 65 So. 993; Evans v. Wilhite, 176 Ala. 287, 58 So. 262.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

BRUNNIER v. HILL
(Jun 30, 1920)