MATTER OF MANDATTO v. HUDSON SHORING COMPANY, N.Y., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

E.C. Sherwood, William B. Davis
Benjamin C. Loder for
James C. Danzilo for claimant,
Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

E.C. Sherwood, William B. Davis
Benjamin C. Loder for
James C. Danzilo for claimant,
Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

In the Matter of the Claim of GRAZIANO M. MANDATTO, Respondent, against HUDSON SHORING COMPANY et al., Appellants. STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent.

Order of Appellate Division and award of the state industrial commission reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the state industrial commission, on the dissenting opinion of HENRY T. KELLOGG, J., below.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MATTER OF MANDATTO v. HUDSON SHORING COMPANY

In the Matter of the Claim of GRAZIANO M. MANDATTO, Respondent, against HUDSON SHORING COMPANY et al., Appellants. STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent.

Comments