Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PANAMA REAL ESTATE CO. v. DIME SAVINGS BANK ET AL.

December 20, 1920. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE FRASER.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Prince, refusing to change the place of trial from Lexington county to Charleston county. The motion was based upon two grounds:

(1) Because Lexington county was not the proper county.

(2) Because the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.

The motion was refused, but the grounds upon which the refusal was based were not stated. If the refusal can be sustained on either ground, it must be sustained. The refusal on the second ground was clearly within his Honor's discretion, and we do not see that he has abused his discretion.

The first ground need not be considered. See Moore v. Arthur, 113 S.C. 112, 101 S.E. 640.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES HYDRICK and WATTS concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and Mr. JUSTICE GAGE absent on account of sickness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PANAMA c. CO. v. DIME SAVINGS BANK
(Dec 20, 1920)