AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of S. WALTER KAUFMANN, an Attorney, Respondent.

CLARKE, P.J.:

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at the October, 1905, term of the Appellate Division, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.

He was joined as a defendant in the same indictment referred to in Matter of Lindheim ( 195 App. Div. 827), handed down herewith, and was convicted at the same time and for the same offense and received the same punishment.

It follows for the reasons set forth in said opinion that he must be disbarred.

LAUGHLIN, DOWLING, SMITH and GREENBAUM, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred. Settle order on notice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF S. WALTER KAUFMANN
(Mar 11, 1921)