ADAMS v. STATE

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

8 Div. 795.

Attorney(S)

Street Bradford, of Guntersville, for Appellant. After discussing several matters, not touched on in the opinion, with citation of authority, counsel insist that under the Mitchell case, the facts did not warrant a conviction. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

Judges

SAMFORD, J.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

8 Div. 795.

Attorney(S)

Street Bradford, of Guntersville, for Appellant. After discussing several matters, not touched on in the opinion, with citation of authority, counsel insist that under the Mitchell case, the facts did not warrant a conviction. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

Judges

SAMFORD, J.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ADAMS v. STATE.

SAMFORD, J.

We have carefully examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that the evidence for the state is not sufficient upon which to base a conviction, and that the affirmative charge as requested by the defendant should have been given. Mitchell v. State, ante, p. 119, 89 So. 98.

For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

ADAMS v. STATE.

Comments