Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE PALMS v. THE STATE.

Theft — Felony — Practice on Appeal.

In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, refused requested instructions cannot be considered; and the indictment being good, and the charge of the court in conformity to the law, the judgment must be affirmed.

LATTIMORE, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Collin County of the offense of theft of property of the value of more than fifty dollars, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There are some questions raised by special charges which were refused, and in the motion for new trial, the correctness of which we can not determine because of the absence of a statement of facts. We have examined the indictment and the charge of the court, which seem to be in conformity with law, and finding no error in the record calling for a reversal an affirmance is ordered.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PALMS v. THE STATE
(Nov 9, 1921)