Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILL FRANCIS v. THE STATE.

Intoxicating Liquor — Possession — Repeal — Sale.

The Acts of the First and Second Called Session of the Thirty-Seventh Legislature, in effect, repealed that provision of the law making the possession of intoxicating liquor an offense, except for the purpose of sale. Following Cox recently decided and judgment is reversed and the cause dismissed.

HAWKINS, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted for having in his possession intoxicating liquor. The Acts of the First and Second Called Sessions of the Thirty-seventh Legislature, page 233, in effect, repealed that provision of the law making the possession an offense, and it is only where the possession is for the purpose of sale that the act is now denounced by the Legislature. Cox v. State, and other cases decided at the present term, but not yet reported.

It, therefore, becomes necessary for this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court and order the prosecution under the present indictment dismissed. Petit v. State, No. 6510, 336, decided November 23, 1921.

Reversed and dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRANCIS v. THE STATE
(Dec 7, 1921)