Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRADFORD v. STATE.

MERRITT, J.

On appeal from the Jefferson county court of misdemeanor, to the circuit court, the defendant was convicted under a complaint which charged that he failed to dip his cattle after being warned to do so.

There are certain demurrers set out in the record, but the judgment entry does not recite that they were presented to, considered, or acted upon by the court, and, this being true, this court cannot consider them. Birmingham, E. B. R. R. Co. v. Hoskins, 14 Ala. App. 254, 69 So. 339; Yarbrough v. State, 15 Ala. App. 460, 73 So. 830.

However, the questions raised by the demurrers have been decided adversely to the defendant in the case of Williams v. State ante, p. 83, 89 So. 97.

There is no bill of exceptions in the transcript; consequently, the court's refusal to give certain written charges asked by the defendant will not be reviewed. 13 Mitchie's Digest, 795; Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 So. 748; Yarbrough v. State, 15 Ala. App. 598, 74 So. 727; Graham v. State, 16 Ala. App. 87, 75 So. 635.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRADFORD v. STATE
(Feb 21, 1922)