DODD v. CARNES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6 Div. 648.

Attorney(S)

Ward, Nash Fendley, of Oneonta, for
Counsel discuss the merits of the case, but without citation of
They do not discuss the motion to
Russell Johnson, of Oneonta, for
The court is without authority to entertain the appeal, as it was not taken in
15
639, 74 So. 745
Acts 1919, p. 84. Counsel also discuss the merits of the

Judges

GARDNER, J.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6 Div. 648.

Attorney(S)

Ward, Nash Fendley, of Oneonta, for
Counsel discuss the merits of the case, but without citation of
They do not discuss the motion to
Russell Johnson, of Oneonta, for
The court is without authority to entertain the appeal, as it was not taken in
15
639, 74 So. 745
Acts 1919, p. 84. Counsel also discuss the merits of the

Judges

GARDNER, J.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

DODD v. CARNES.

GARDNER, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant in the circuit court of Blount county on March 15, 1921. Bonds for supersedeas and appeal were approved and filed November 2, 1921. It is insisted by counsel for appellee that, as the appeal was therefore taken more than six months after the rendition of the judgment, it should be dismissed. Acts 1919, p. 84. The point is well taken. The question is a jurisdictional one, and the appeal must be dismissed. Walden v. Leach, 201 Ala. 475, 78 So. 381.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DODD v. CARNES.

Comments