Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STOLLE et al. v. KANETZKY.

JENKINS, J.

We are loath to disturb the verdict of a jury upon issues of fact in any case, and especially so in this case, as there have been two verdicts in favor of appellee; but the evidence, both as to the insanity of Christian Stolle, and as to the undue influence of August Stolle, is so unsatisfactory that we feel we ought not to let the judgment in this case stand. Perhaps upon another trial one or the other of the parties to this suit may be able to produce more satisfactory evidence on the issues involved.

For the reason that the verdict of the jury is against the overwhelming weight of the testimony, this case is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STOLLE v. KANETZKY
(Mar 29, 1922)